Leadership During Crisis

Community Conversations

Follow the leaders: Spotlight on Leadership In Crisis Program

September 1, 2021

Late last summer, as our nation grappled with the longstanding effects of institutionalized racism and racial inequity, CA’s leadership posed bold questions: how can we empower and encourage our students to delve deeper into the complex issues playing out so vividly in the headlines? How can we inspire and develop the next generation of leaders who might help move our country towards a more equitable future?

From our Center for Community Engagement came one answer: a new, year-long, experimental, and expeditionary cross-grade program—the Leadership During Crisis Program—designed to experientially and intellectually immerse students in the complex intersections of history, inequity, social change, anti-racism, and leadership.

“We wanted to drop students into the middle of a deep, wide complex debate about what this country is, what it wants to be, and how leadership can help it move toward those ideals,” explains Dr. Michael McElreath, CA’s Director of Experiential Learning.

“I sketched out an idea to use the pandemic and the fight for Black justice as focal points—as windows into other crises in American history—to better understand how leaders reacted. We’d investigate how those reactions shaped the ‘story of America,’ and what this next generation of leaders—our students—could learn about leadership from those choices, both good and bad.”

As students would be grappling with traumatic histories and events, creating an atmosphere of trust—one in which students felt comfortable sharing their authentic selves and experiences—was paramount, but not without challenge.

“For our students to get the most out of the experience—to be able to thoroughly explore some nuanced and difficult moments and have the chance to learn from each other’s perspectives and experiences—I knew they had to meet face-to-face,” McElreath shares with a sigh. “But at that moment, given COVID, it was obvious that we were not going to hold in-person classes any time soon.”

Putting it together

The solution was something radical: program members—students and faculty alike—would become a distinct and mobile learning community. They would meet on-campus for multiple periods, multiple days each week, and participate in expeditionary field trips (with careful COVID protocols in place, of course), while their Upper School peers remained virtual.

“A self-contained ‘school within a school’ was an exciting idea we’d talked about but never tackled before now,” says McElreath. “It seemed the best way to give the students the chance to dive deep into all of these experiences, make meaningful connections, and come out of the class with a sense of purpose.”

Partnering with Upper School English teacher and Entrepreneurship Director Palmer Seeley, McElreath and Seeley crafted an ambitious interdisciplinary curriculum that spanned social studies, social activism, art as a social practice, and English literature (students still attended regular math and science classes, which fell outside of the program’s scope).

In collegiate seminar-style discussions designed to amplify peer learning opportunities, students explored a variety of works of non-fiction and historical fiction. Together, they unpacked American history from multiple viewpoints—including their own—and discovered narratives that were often at stark odds with the sanitized and simplified story often presented as the American experience.

The group delved into the racial violence woven throughout American history with Ta-Nehisi Coates’s Between the World and Me. They gained rich insights into the complexity and intersectionality of race, gender, and class relations in America via the 17th century slave trade in Toni Morrison’s A Mercy. Ibram Kendi’s personal tale of racism’s toxic effects—How to Be an Antiracist—offered a call to action for systemic change. These and other books provided critical context for the events and places the students were exploring and experiencing firsthand.

Indeed, beyond books and classroom discussion, expeditionary firsthand learning was a crucial element of the program. The group frequently traveled within North Carolina, visiting the State Capitol grounds to see where recently-removed Confederate monuments once stood, to Civil War battlefields, and the site of the 1898 Wilmington coup by white supremacists against the elected leaders of the then-majority Black city.

“Getting out of the classroom and to the places where history happened makes the events and their effects on American society tangible to students. It was critical to the program experience. Being in those places allows us to develop a personal link to history and empathy for the people who lived it—it’s no longer just a fact in a book or an image on a screen; you can imagine what it would have been like to live it yourself,” says McElreath.

“We also visited several sites where later generations have marked historical events in a variety of ways—and not always honestly,” he continues. “Discussions about why and how those with power sometimes attempt to weaponize history in the service of maintaining power was an important part of our discussions about leadership this year.”

Leaning in

In all aspects of the program, students were encouraged to take the lead—to investigate, interrogate, and draw connections about what they were learning through the lens of their own varied experiences and perspectives. “Being forced to make the connections ourselves helped us better understand exactly what happened in the past and how it came about,” shares Maris James ’23.

“Going into this class, the only thing we had in common was that we all went to the same school. We all brought our different experiences and perspectives into this class, which definitely shaped the way each of us analyzed history. While the course was based on a common set of facts, what we learned about leadership traits and how we can implement those into our own lives was drawn from our own experiences and what we—as individuals—see every day.”

Peer learning and peer mentorship opportunities were carefully and purposefully cultivated, down to the very organizational structures and assignments chosen for the program. Students often assumed the role of teacher, conducting independent research projects on historical events and figures and then teaching it to their peers as formal lessons.

“These student-led sessions were a vital part of the program concept,” says McElreath. “Preparing to teach a lesson requires mastery of the topic. Peer teaching ensures that students are engaged and invested in the shared experience of learning.”

And, it worked. More often than not, the students were so caught-up in their conversations that discussions spilled out of the classroom, onto the Quad during lunch, and into the after-school hours. “There was one day, early on, when we all just sat together at lunch and kept the conversation going,” shares Clay Thornton ’21. “From that point on, we all started eating together so we could keep talking about what we had said in class.”

“Peer mentorship was critical for the program. It’s not enough for the students to learn about leadership,” offers Seeley. “They needed the opportunity—and the environment—that let them lead the conversation. It had to feel organic, relevant, and have the right balance of guidance and agency. It was important that Michael and I be part of the community but to do so by guiding discussions, not leading them.”
That “guide-on-the-side” approach was well received by students and faculty alike, solidifying the bonds amongst group members. “We felt like a community. Dr. Mac and Mr. Seeley were in the class with us—even if they were sometimes 200 pages ahead in the book,” laughs Sydney Ross ’23. “It felt so good to have the teachers involved. The chance to be real when we talked about these really difficult events was so helpful.”

The strategic decision to make the program cross-grade—comprised of sophomores, juniors, and seniors, many of whom had never been in the same room—was similarly instrumental in fostering an engaging peer-led environment.

“The seniors had two years’ more knowledge, experiences, and skills to draw upon, but the sophomores were at a point in their high school careers that they could take more academic risk,” explains Seeley. “Taking those risks can provide them opportunities to expand their understanding of the world in ways that most people don’t get until college or later.”

Purposefully including students at different moments in their respective learning journeys proved lucrative, encouraging personal growth and reflection as students became sounding boards and learning resources for each other. Together, they developed a more nuanced and multifaceted understanding, not only of the historical and contemporary moments they were exploring and experiencing, but of each other.

“The year let me get to know the voices and perspectives of my peers in the class on a much deeper level than in my other courses,” says Kate Sandreuter ’23. “I gained confidence for speaking up in class and got to explore issues on a deeper level by listening to the different perspectives of other people experiencing the same thing.”

The year-long format allowed the students time to develop crucial nuance. “You might think that our opinions over the year would have become more homogenous,” reflects Eli Weinstein ’21. “As the class went on, however, I realized just how different each of us was. And that, in turn, changed the way I saw the American story. I realize now how it has been co-opted time and again; the fact is, the American story isn’t one thing.”

The flexible, experiential format also supported different learning styles. “As someone who struggles with memorizing facts and dates, this is one of those courses where—because we’re so discussion focused—we get to move beyond the what and when, and focus more on the who and the why, and how it connects with the things that we’re living through,” shares Lexie Davilla ’23.

Living history

It was that relaxed, flexible structure that allowed the class to pivot as history unfolded during the U.S. Capitol riot on January 6, 2021. “When January 6 happened, it felt like it was the logical next part of where the discussion had to go,” says McElreath. “It brought home, in realtime, just how quickly a single event can affect the course of history. And it gave the students the opportunity to lead informal discussions with their peers who weren’t part of the program.”

“In that moment, it was almost like Dr. Mac and Mr. Seeley were in class with us,” says Thornton. “But they were also guides—helping point out the things that we, as high school students, might not have the life experience to pick up on or contextualize. It helped me process all the questions I had swirling in my mind, and it’s helped, since then, when talking to my friends from outside the program.”

While the academic year and formal program might have drawn to an end, the work begun in the class is far from over. “Ultimately these debates, these conversations about American identity are not going to end,” offers McElreath. “But that’s true for the nation, as well. We had that conversation for nine months. We may have finished the class, but, hopefully, the students are not finished with the conversation.”

They certainly aren’t. Already, McElreath and Seeley’s students have been incubating ways that they can turn their newly honed leadership skills to personal interests, both on campus and beyond. To name just a few: Eli Weinstein and Jared Seidel are exploring a re-branding of anti-fascism in hopes of helping to effectively stem the rising global tides of fascism; Bela Chandler and Jenna Pullen have created an animal wellness awareness campaign that aired on the Middle School’s CAST News; and Lexie Davila utilized educational resources about LGBTQIA+ issues created by Leadership During Crisis classmate classmate Christina Polge to facilitate the “Introduction to Gender & Sexuality” workshop during YES! (What’s YES! you ask? Just read on to find out.)

Written by Dan Smith, Digital Content Producer and Social Media Manager


Varsity cross country teams take TISAC trophy

CA Curious

The joys of an (ir)regular routine

CA Curious

Middle School Reflections

Leadership During Crisis students study the coup d'etat in Wilmington, NC

CA Curious

The lessons learned by living through history

March 25, 2021

“We’re living through history right now 
with major crises that seem to be happening almost daily.” 
-Christina Polge ’22 

Like so many people across the country and the world, we in the Center for Community Engagement spent much of spring 2020 checking in with one another about how everyone was doing amid pandemic-imposed virtual school and masked grocery shopping.  

Our conversations, like those with many of our students at the time, kept turning to how we were keenly aware of how race and economic status were shaping disparities in how different populations were experiencing the pandemic.  

Over the summer, as the nation continued to reckon with the ongoing effects of its legacy of racial inequity, CA committed to redoubling its diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts and advancing social justice work. So, when the administration asked us to develop an experimental interdisciplinary program for a cohort of students, the questions we had already been grappling with took on new salience: What are the traits of a leader who responds effectively to a crisis, and what are the hallmarks of a successful response to a crisis? And, perhaps most crucially, how do we inspire and instill these traits and skills in our next generation of leaders?! 

After lengthy collaboration and consideration, we arrived at our proposed answer: a new, collaboratively taught, interdisciplinary, cross-grade level experiential curriculum designed to engage students in the complex intersectionalities of race, gender, and class relations in America. We pitched our Leadership During Crisis program to Upper School students, and receiving an enthusiastic response, ultimately formed a cohort of twelve 10th – 12th grade students. 

By any measure, it has been a productive and eye-opening year for all involved.   

We have read, discussed, journaled, and written essays; we have also interacted with past and current climactic events.  

We have visited sites of memory (and amnesia)—battlefields, monuments, and memorials—and an outdoor exhibit of sculptures by North Carolina artists that engage the year’s overlapping crises.  

We have attended live conferences by Zoom, which have enabled us to hear from a range of speakers—from local anti-racism education activists to First Nations singer/songwriter and activist Lyla June to Nobel Laureate and past president of Liberia Ellen Johnson Sirleaf.  

We witnessed the Capitol insurrection live in class and took in the Inauguration at the Capitol a couple weeks later. We discussed the Wilmington Coup of 1898 and Amanda Gorman’s The Hill We Climb to process both events. 

We have found our rhythm, but February 5 was no ordinary Friday for the US Leadership During Crisis cohort; instead of meeting together in person as usual, the students fanned out across campus to Zoom into the NC Association of Independent Schools Diversity & Inclusion Conference as presenters. 

After a brief overview of the program by us teachers, we turned things over to the students.  

Bella Nesbeth ’22 and Christina Polge ’22 discussed what drew them to opt into the program. Christina said: 

“The class and the opportunity could not have come at a more meaningful time for me or for the world. Especially during the pandemic, I think it’s so important that everyone has a good sense of self.  I also wanted to learn how to use my privilege both as a white person and a student at a private school to be able to help others who are struggling more than I am. With the events of the past year– such as Breonna Taylor and George Floyd’s deaths–I wanted to understand how I can be a good ally and community member. We’re living through history right now with major crises that seem to be happening almost daily. So, not only was this program interesting to me, but it’s also timely and extremely relevant.” 

Sydney Ross ’23 and Maris James ’23 laid out how Ta-Nehisi Coates’ Between the World and Me set up important themes which framed our discussions of subsequent literary works and their historical contexts.  

Maris introduced Coates’ complication of the American Dream in which, as she put it, “people live in oblivion from the safety of their own homes which shields them from the cold hard truth that many people must experience every day. And it is in waking up from the Dream and stepping out from behind the picket fence of security that we bring the change that our community, and our country so desperately needs.” And Sydney explained how the class has examined historical and fictional leaders’ motivations through Coates’ lens on people stumbling despite best intentions: “Good intentions is a hall pass through history, a sleeping pill that ensures the Dream.” 

Jenna Pullen ’23 and Bela Chandler ’23 discussed how Toni Morrison’s A Mercy explores the complexity and intersectionality of race, gender, and class relations in America through historical fiction set in 1680s Maryland: “The race relations throughout A Mercy are important because they show the relationships and hierarchy between different races during that period. Regardless of someone’s place in society, other’s perspectives of them based on their race set the first impression, and that is not easily changed.” 

Eli Weinstein ’21 transitioned to the cohort’s examination of leadership, explaining that “societal memory–the stories a group tells about itself–sits at the intersection of history and leadership. This is because leadership is inherently about the future, and in shaping the future a leader must create and use an understanding of history. The tool a leader uses to create that understanding of history is memory. We employ memory every time we look to the past to tell us where we should go. This cohort has seen in every book we’ve read and every historical site we’ve visited, the tremendous consequence of memory.”  

And Jared Seidel ’22 pointed to Ibram Kendi’s How to Be An Anti-Racist as an example of how leaders can reexamine society’s narrative of the past to wake people from what Coates terms the Dream to the legacy which has brought about the present reality. 

Camryn Friedman ’23 and Clay Thornton ’21 shared their plans for the leadership-in-action component of the program—projects the students designed in February and will undertake throughout the spring to address crises that speak to them. 

Lexie Davalos ’23 and Kate Sandreuter ’23 concluded the presentation by detailing how the program has “met and exceeded” their expectations. Kate told the assembled educators that “I assumed the courses would follow a more traditional approach, but I’ve been really pleasantly surprised to have found that the classes’ flexibility to allow lots of space for us to discuss related and relevant topics–including current events–and adjacent themes.”  

Lexie summed up the impact the program has had on her, offering: “Our country is going through massive changes right now, and this program has given me a lot of reasons to want to be a part of it. Now not only do I wish to be a lawyer, but I’ve been able to narrow my focus to immigration, criminal defense, or civil rights. Our hope is that the more our generation can bring awareness to the social, racial, and economic injustices prevalent in our society today, the more change we can produce. The impact this program has had on my life is something I would hope everyone gets a chance to experience.” 

We are so very grateful to these students for joining our adventure with open minds and open hearts. While this has been a trying year for us all, our work together has been sustaining and inspiring. 

Written by Dr. Michael McElreath and Palmer Seeley, Experiential Learning Director and Entrepreneurship Coordinator

CA Curious

When history happens overnight

CA Curious

Spring in North Carolina can be wonderful!

CA and NC State co-host USAYPT